2024年4月4日 星期四

"The Winter Fortress" by Neal Bascomb (2016)


"Wallis Jackson, Bill Bray, and the twenty-eight other Royal Engineers were well primed for their operation.  They ate sandwiches and smoked cigarettes outside the Nissen huts on the barren seaside Scottish moor that made up Skitten airfield.  There was some banter, the false bravado of men about to head into action.  Others handled their nerves in silence.  There would be a final briefing, but they already knew what they needed to know: they were heading to Norway to blow up a power station and hydrogen plant."

Neal Bascomb is a former journalist who's written several nonfiction books on World War II.

In The Winter Fortress several Norwegians escape their country during the German occupation of Norway.  They flee to the United Kingdom, where they're trained as commandos at a camp in Scotland.  Their mission?  To destroy or disable an electrical plant producing heavy water, a material used in German nuclear research.

In relation to the historical record, this book introduces one of the more interesting chapters in World War II history.  Norway isn't often discussed in the context of the war, and the German effort to develop a uranium-fueled nuclear reaction is also left outside of most discussions of the time period.  The commandos sent back into Norway are also interesting in their own right, being men of great personal fortitude tasked with a near-impossible feat.

In dramatic terms, however, I'm not sure whether or not the author really "found the story" in the events which constitute The Winter Fortress.  For one thing, the Germans really weren't that far along in their nuclear research, and framing this tale as a "race against time" doesn't really work.  So what if the Nazis secured a supply of heavy water?  Didn't they have bigger problems on their eastern front?  And weren't they somewhat incapacitated by an internal focus on a rocket program and squabbling between ambitious scientists?  It's hard to imagine the German scientists, laboring as they were in increasingly primitive conditions, developing a fission bomb with the resources at their disposal.  The German nuclear program was at best a pale shadow of the Manhattan Project, so aside from the usual Nazi thuggery it's hard to view the Nazi's nuclear ambitions as much of a threat.

And then there's the fact that many of the best minds in Germany had already left that country during the early years of Hitler's rise to power.  During the events related in The Winter Fortress, they were, in fact, on the other side of the Atlantic, working on the Manhattan Project.  The German atomic program, by contrast, couldn't even get the complete cooperation of companies within Germany.

Lastly, considered from the point of view of style, The Winter Fortress reads at times like a lower grade spy novel.  The author often attempts, somewhat clumsily, to end chapters on cliffhangers, a strategy that sometimes mediates against the book's more serious tone.

Were I to give it a score, I'd say 7 stars out of 10.  It presents some interesting episodes from the Second World War, and also some riveting stories of survival, but I feel that The Winter Fortress is very rough around the edges.  Focusing on a single commando might have improved it, or if not that then restricting the narrative to a shorter time frame.  But as it is The Winter Fortress doesn't achieve the epic sweep its author was obviously aiming for, seeming instead like something rushed into print before he was ready to provide the fullest account of this overlooked series of events.

Related Entries:

2024年3月29日 星期五

Still More 70s Movies

I'll be adding to this as I go.


1. Survival (1975)

HOW LONG WILL GOD HAVE

PATIENCE WITH US BEFORE

HE DOES SOMETHING DRASTIC

TO GET OUR ATTENTION?

There's a lot to unpack here:

1. Are we assuming that God, that being present since the beginning of the world, has a limited supply of patience?  And that, moreover, He can run out of patience?

2. What' does "drastic" mean in the context of an omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient diety?  Drastic for whom?

3. Can't God command our attention any time He wants to?  Or is that somehow against the rules that He Himself has set forth?

And what's the deal with that prologue anyway?  That doesn't sound like any part of the Bible I ever read.  There are bits of the Bible in there, yes, but also a lot of assumptions that are new to me.

The Premise: A family is stranded in the desert after a plane crash.

Where Are They Now?: Star Robert Sella most recently appeared on the Law & Order: Special Victims Unit TV show.  Yes, careers can survive even the likes of Survival.

Overall: A Christian movie!  Praise be!  I'm going to go ahead and assume that those who made this movie were high on THE LORD and nothing else.  So weird, so badly acted and so terrible it's worth checking out.



Barnaby Jones!  Vague memories of that show...

The Premise: Passengers aboard a flight from England to the States find their travel plans thwarted by an ancient artifact.

Where Are They Now?: Most recently William Shatner appeared on The Masked Singer.  According to Wikipedia he now spends a lot of time arguing with people online.

Paul Winfield passed away in 2004.  His film and television work came to an end in 2003.

Chuck Connors, that quintessential "Western type," passed away in 1992.  His last big movie was Airplane II: The Sequel.

Overall: The first half of this movie is solid, but the second half features, unfortunately, William Shatner doing a less than convincing impression of what Gene Hackman did in The Poseidon Adventure the year before.


Yeah, it was the 70s.  Airplane movies were a thing.  Which flavor do YOU prefer?  "Hostage" or "disaster?"  Maybe both?

The Premise: Things go very, very wrong for a group of passengers flying from Salt Lake City to New York.

Where Are They Now?: Ah, Marjoe Gortner, that pillar of Western cinema.  His last movie was 1995's Wild Bill.  He's still alive, but I couldn't find any details concerning his current whereabouts.

Overall: It starts off well, but pacing is an issue.  I get that they were filming for television, but a lot of the middle section could have been cut out.



I will always think Cliff Robertson deserved another Oscar for Obsession.  Anyone who thinks otherwise can fight me!

The Premise: Robertson, Michael Caine and Denholm Elliot lead a squad of British soldiers in an attack on an Imperial Japanese outpost.

Where Are They Now?: Cliff Robertson died in 2011 at the ripe old age of 88.  His last screen appearance was a cameo as Uncle Ben in Sam Raimi's Spider Man 3.

Michael Caine is now ten years younger than Cliff Robertson was in 2011.  Retired as of this year, 2023's The Great Escaper will be his and (the great) Glenda Jackson's final appearances on film.

Denholm Elliot passed on in 1992.  He was a casualty of the AIDS epidemic.

Director Robert Aldrich had some hits in the 60s, but from the 70s onward his career was definitely winding down.  He directed The Dirty Dozen, Whatever Happened to Baby Jane? and The Longest Yard.  He and Cliff Robertson despised one another.  Robertson was only cast in this movie over Aldrich's objections.

Overall: There are some great scenes between the principal actors, but the score really hurts this movie.  On top of this there's also the ending, which falls completely flat.  Did that character carrying the essential intelligence really just walk right back into the shooting gallery?  How could anyone know that all of the Japanese had left the scene?


5. Rituals (a.k.a. The Creeper) (1977)

The Premise: A party of doctors find themselves stalked through the wilderness by a mysterious assailant.

Where Are They Now?: Hal Holbrook passed away in 2021.  He was in a lot of great 70s and 80s movies, including The Great White Hope, All the President's Men and Wall Street.

Overall: This movie still enjoys a following, but in my opinion it too closely resembles 1972's Deliverance, which is a far better film.  Another problem is the ending.  The dialogue seems to be building up to some kind of plot twist, but this plot twist never really arrives.



Like Rituals, another Canadian effort.

The Premise: Several friends engage in a "prank" which leads to serious consequences for everyone involved.

Where Are They Now?: John Candy!  Yep, he's in this.  This was his fourth movie, following Tunnel Vision, which came out the same year.  Anyone else remember that one?

Overall: A well written, well acted movie that suffers from lower production values (especially the sound).  The order in which certain scenes were edited is a mystery, but overall it was much better than I thought it would be.

Related Entries:

2024年3月19日 星期二

Some Other Movies From 2024

I'll be adding to this as the year progresses.


1. Argylle

Just awful.  One of the worst movies I've seen in a long, long time and that's saying a lot.  The thing that really killed me, aside from the sappy dialogue exchanged between Bryce Dallas Howard and Sam Rockwell, is that scene where she skates over oil while fighting off bad guys.  I can only hope director Matthew Vaughn makes better choices in the future.


2. Dune: Part Two

Definitely better than the first one, but three hours without an intermission is asking a lot.  I liked that they showed more of the tech in this film, and also that we saw more of the other planets.  The bit on Geidi Prime was, for me, the best part of the movie.

I'd watch Dune Messiah, but if it's even longer than Dune: Part Two I might pass on seeing it in the theater.


3. Damsel

She's a princess but she's tough!  It's kinda Disney until they throw her to her death, and after that you wonder what kind of exercise regimen she was pursuing in her princess castle up to that point.  I'm guessing that EVERY day was arm day.

If you happen to be a fourteen year old girl you'll be all over this one.  If not you'll be wondering why you bothered.


4. Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire

To quote Taylor Swift: "Haters gonna hate."  Likewise, monsters gonna STOMP.

I like movies about big, stompy monsters.  Correction: I really, really like movies about big, stompy monsters.  What's that, you say?  Rome is in danger?  Hong Kong is about to be destroyed for the thousandth time?  The people of Los Angeles are fleeing?  There's panic in the streets in New York?  Tokyo come in, Tokyo?  Tokyo?  Whatever it is, sign me up, I'm ready.

My favorite parts of this movie were the blogger's pseudo-explanations and the idea that a team of people, somewhere, possibly working for a national government, decided to make a giant robotic arm for the gigantic ape.  I never, in other words, expected any of it to make sense.  I was there for the stomping.


5. Kung Fu Panda 4

By-the-numbers sequel to the lucrative franchise.  I laughed twice, and the remainder of the movie was forgettable fun.  I've got to say, Jack Black kills it singing that Britney Spears cover.  No idea whether or not autotune was involved, but it sounded authentic to me.

Related Entries:

"The Jealousy Man" by Jo Nesbo (2021)


I recently reviewed Jo Nesbo's The Snowman.  That review can be found here.

The Jealousy Man is a collection of the author's short stories.  One of these stories, the last one, is excellent, while the other 11 range from implausible to pretty good.

The story for which this anthology is named felt a bit uneven to me.  On the one hand I enjoyed its Greek tragedy aspect, but the way in which the narrator gets the perpetrator to confess seemed very contrived to me.

Another, very long story/novella which takes up nearly half this collection's length was so depressing I had to put it down and rest for long periods.  It was clearly written in the midst of COVID, and it explores a kind of standing argument between a lawyer and a rich friend accustomed to exploiting his position.

The story which begins the book is good, if a little predictable.  A woman meets a handsome stranger on a plane and fate intervenes.

The last story in this collection was by far my favorite.  This story, set in a future ruled by corporations that employ assassins against one another with near-impunity, reminded me of the manga Jojo's Bizarre Adventure, and if that reference goes over your head this story probably isn't for you.  Let's just say it gets weird and I like "weird" a lot.

The other stories?  Honestly I can't remember them that well, so I won't discuss them here.  I think that overall this collection is worth seeking out, though I didn't enjoy it nearly as much as The Snowman.  I'm guessing that the author was attempting to stretch out from the crime fiction genre with some of these stories, but I'm thinking that his more genre-specific books are, on average, better.

Related Entries:

2024年2月15日 星期四

"Redshirts" by John Scalzi (2012)


"'Yes, and I have training dealing with deep, existential questions,' Dahl said, 'The way I'm dealing with it right now is this: I don't care whether I really exist or don't, whether I'm real or fictional.  What I want right now is to be the person who decides my own fate.  That's something I can work on.  It's what I'm working on now.'"

John Scalzi is a science fiction writer living in California.  He's known for both his novels and his blog Whatever, which delves into a variety of topics.

This is the first of his novels that I've read, though I've heard his name mentioned for many years now.  He seems to have a very loyal following, and after reading Redshirts I can understand why.

In Redshirts several "extras" living out a television show come to grips with the fact that the situations in which they find themselves aren't as authentic as they once assumed, and as they delve deeper into their predicament they become aware of a much larger reality beyond the confines of their starship.

Highlighting this narrative is the author's sense of humor.  Imagine Philip K. Dick, for example, getting "recursive and meta" (to use Scalze's words), but instead of retreating into his usual hopelessness and paranoia PKD stops to crack a joke.  This ability to poke fun at his characters while telling challenging stories is what sets Scalze apart from many other writers.

My only complaint is the three "extra chapters" tacked on to the end of this book.  In my opinion these "codas" were completely unnecessary, and their more serious tone brought down what was otherwise a fun little jaunt through a universe not too far removed from Star Trek.  These extra chapters seem more like unsuccessful attempts at the original novel, and while two of the three would work well as short stories, they're really too different in tone to bear inclusion alongside Redshirts, the main narrative.

I look forward to reading more of Scalzi's books in the future.  I haven't seen any in the bookstores I frequent, but perhaps I'll stumble across something by him in the summer.

Related Entries:

2024年2月8日 星期四

"The Ministry for the Future" by Kim Stanley Robinson (2020)


"If I could get policymakers, and citizens, everywhere to read just one book this year, it would be Kim Stanley Robinson's The Ministry for the Future."

--Ezra Klein, Vox

But why?  What are these policymakers and citizens supposed to get out of this book?  Does it offer any realistic solutions to the problem of climate change?  None that I could see...

"Masterly."

--New Yorker

Agree to disagree?  I think that in terms of story and characterization this book is an abysmal failure.

"Robinson is the SF writer of my lifetime, and this stands as some of his best work.  It's my book of the year."

--Locus

Nope.  There are much better SF writers out there.  This also isn't even close to Robinson's best work.  2312 was much better, and even Green Mars, which I also read a while back, was more interesting.

"A breathtaking look at the challenges that face our planet in all their sprawling magnitude and also in their intimate, individual moments of humanity."

--Booklist

If you ask me, "humanity" is exactly what's missing from large swathes of this book.  The chapters near the beginning and end have some dramatic impact, but everything between them consists of a long, tiresome lecture on climate change which adjoins a series of impractical solutions to this problem, none of which are explained to anyone's satisfaction.  Given the time scale involved, this novel is even more fantastical than books dealing with the terraforming of Mars, human reactions to a "first contact," or any number of other science fiction tropes.

"The Ministry for the Future serves as a blueprint for how we can throw climate change into reverse and actually reverse the amount of carbon in the atmosphere over the next three decades."

--Mashable

Really?  I'm not seeing much of a "blueprint" here.  What I'm seeing instead is a series of increasingly impractical ideas that are never explained in full.  If you'll excuse the pun, the author is on firmer ground when it comes to "geoengineering," but some of the chapters offering economic solutions to the climate change problem are downright laughable.  

Most galling of all is the author's dismissal of the online architecture in which many of us function.  It's like he's never heard of Google and the other corporations who hold so much sway over modern life, not to mention the ease with which this "Ministry for the Future" renders something like Facebook obsolete.  Does he really think that the rest of us haven't heard of blockchain?  Or end-to-end encryption?

... anyway, by now you're well aware that I didn't like this book.  It's long-winded, it's extremely pretentious (in particular the "riddle" chapters), and in narrative terms it's a mess.  Perhaps most infuriating of all is the fact that the workings of the Ministry of the Future itself are never described in any detail, to the point that we're left with only the understanding that they somehow "do things," without ever knowing how.

Some of the other blurbs on or inside this book go on to color The Ministry for the Future as "utopian."  This description is, to some extent, accurate, but I think that doing so does a disservice to other utopian novels, many of which were much better executed.

Related Entries: